IF YOU WANT TO DISCOVER WHERE THE REAL POWER LIES, FIND OUT WHO BENEFITS FROM THE ‘EXCEPTIONS’ TO YOUR SUPPOSED ‘INALIENABLE’ RIGHTS!
UN RESOLUTION ON CENSORSHIP OF THE MOST IMPORTANT SUBJECT DEMANDING OUR ATTENTION TODAY
The Gospel’s Jesus warns ‘The LAW brings death’. This UN Resolution, like the UN clause on ‘declaration of pandemics’, will bring DEATH to Millions at first, then BILLIONS.
Here is the LEGAL WEASELING by which we are DEPRIVED OF ALL OUR SUPPOSEDLY INALIENABLE HUMAN RIGHTS. It is how we ARE effectively ALIENATED FROM them.
Before we begin, please consider the weasel words that follow: … may therefore be subject to certain restrictions, but these shall only be such as are provided by law and are necessary for respect of the rights or reputations of others, and for the protection of national security or of public order, or of public health or morals…
No inalienable right MAY be subject to ‘certain restrictions’. But the U.N, like most Western nations, HAVE alienated us FROM our human rights and liberties, under the PRETEXT, the NARRATIVE, ‘The Official Narrative’, of PROTECTING someone, something, or even us, FROM something IMAGINARY. As if challening ‘The Official Holocaust Narrative’ or ‘The Official Virus Narrative’ could in any way harm ANYONE, other than perhaps in the way CRIMINALS may expect their CONSPIRACIES to be harmed, by EXPOSURE. The first NARRATIVES offered were based on MORALITY and reference to some IMAGINARY GOD. Later the ‘National security’ narrative was used as COVER for every human rights abuse, and especially SECRECY and CENSORSHIP, and PROPAGANDA i.e the right of governments to DECEIVE their own citizens to TRICK them into fighting and paying for wars, and giving up their human rights, including freedom of speech. The latest expression of the de facto world dictatorship was to claim an IMAGINARY HEALTH EMERGENCY, as COVER for economic wrecking, and denial of citizens their very humanity itself. Their dignity as human beings. And ALL their inalienable human rights. And censorship of all the voices EXPOSING THE NARRATIVE AS A FRAUD was as rampant as the censorship that has been the ONLY means for ‘The Official Holocaust Narrative’ to survive at all!
And with regard to … ‘necessary for respect of the rights or reputations of others…’ I would remind you that the REPUTATION of entire GENERATIONS of Germans has been DEFAMED. How is this consistent with ‘respect’ for the reputations of others? If I made a the equivalent of ANY of the many Hollywood movies and series ‘Inspired by real events’ or ‘Based on real events’, or based on a work of FICTION, which replaced ‘Nazis’ with ‘Jews’ in the main roles, I would be arrested and imprisoned. If I went on Youtube and claimed my god demanded the genocide of all ‘Jews’, I would be immediately censored and arrested. Double standards reveal WHO has the REAL power in any society. And Voltaire reminded us that ‘If you want to know who REALLY rules over you, just find out whom you are NOT allowed to criticise!’.
RECENTLY WE HAVE SEEN THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES REPEAT BLATANT WAR PROPAGANDA PRODUCED BY THE ISRAELI GOVERNMENT, CONCERNING THE ALLEGATION THAT PALESTINIANS CUT THE HEADS OFF ISRAELI BABIES, ‘BAKED’ BABIES IN OVENS, AND GANG RAPED ISRAELI WOMEN IN THE STREETS OF GAZA. WE HAVE SEEN THE VERY TOP ISRAELI POLITICAL, MILITARY, AND RELIGIOUS LEADERS, FROM THE PRIME MINISTER, THE KNESSET, DEFENCE MINISTRY, AND INFLUENTIAL PUBLIC FIGURES, INVOKE THE GENOCIDE OF PALESTINIANS, IN GAZA, WITH THE CONFLATION OF THEM WITH ‘AMALEK’. WHILE THE POLITICAL LEADERS IN GERMANY, BRITAIN, AND AMERICA, SPEAKING AS IF THAT REFERENCE IS ‘UP FOR THEOLOGICAL DEBATE’, RATHER THAN THE SIMPLE INVOCATION OF CLEAR TORAH REFERENCES TO THE GENOCIDES COMMANDED BY THEIR GOD, AND CARRIED OUT, BY THEIR MYTHICAL HEROES SUCH AS JOSHUA, AND KING DAVID. THE SAME GENOCIDES AT LEAST ONE JEWISH RABBI HAS BEEN INVOKING ON YOUTUBE FOR OVER 7 YEARS. HIS ‘FREEDOM OF SPEECH’ TO INVOKE GENOCIDE OF ‘ALL THE FORMER NATIONS OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE’ AND AMERICA, AND GERMANY, AND MOST OF THE WESTERN NATIONS, APPEARS SECURE. WHILE ATTEMPTS TO EXPOSE THE ONGOING GENOCIDE OF THE PALESTINIAN PEOPLE ARE CENSORED. AND I AM NOT ALLOWED TO EXPRESS THE LOGICAL CONCLUSIONS OF WHAT SUCH A STATE OF AFFAIRS SUGGEST ABOUT EXCESSIVE, DECISIVE, ‘JEWISH’ POWER. I HAVE CHOSEN THIS PARAGRAPH AS THE MOST BLATANTLY DISINGENOUS PARAGRAPH IN THE ENTIRE UN PROPOSAL. AND AS THE ONLY PARAGRAPH WE MAY PUBLICALLY DISCUSS, IN NATIONS LIKE GERMANY, ESTONIA, AUSTRALIA, BRITAIN, CANADA, AND MOST OF THE EUROPEAN UNION AND EVEN RUSSIA, BECAUSE OF THE CLEAR, ONE-SIDED, ABSOLUTE LACK OF RESPECT FOR THE ALLEGED ‘AFFIRMATION’ THEY MAKE VERBALLY, AND IN WRITING, BUT COMPLETELY FAIL TO RESPECT IN PRACTISE. IN FACT GOING SO FAR AS TO CRIMINALISE A CLEARLY DEFINED (IN PRACTISE BUT OFTEN DELIBERATELY HIDDEN WITH LEGALESE AND EXPECTED JUDICIAL ‘INTERPRETATOIN’ IN THE WRITTEN LEGAL CODES), SET OF RELATED OPINIONS, AND FACTUAL, DOCUMENTED, INFORMATION AND EVIDENCE-BASED SCIENCE AND EVIDENCE-BASED HISTORICAL METHODOLOGY. TO THE POINT OF CRIPPLING ANY POSSIBILITY OF ‘INFORMED CONSENT’ AND THUS REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY. IN FACT CRIMINALISING ANY ATTEMPT TO ORGANISE, LET ALONE OFFER, POLITICAL REPRESENTATION FOR PARTICULAR POLITICAL OPINIONS AND POLITICAL ORGANISATIONS FOUNDED ON OBJECTIVE, CONCRETE, VERIFIED, SCIENTIFIC AND HISTORICAL FACTS. THEY JUST DISMISS THESE FACTS, AND MAKE IF A CRIMINAL ACT, WITH PUNISHMENTS MORE SEVERE THAN FOR RAPE OR MURDER, TO OFFER THEM PUBLICALLY, LET ALONE ATTEMPT TO ORGANISE, AND PARTICIPATE IN, FREE AND OPEN, PUBLIC, DISCUSSION OF THE MERITS OF EACH SIDE OF THE ARGUMENT. IN FACT NO SUCH ‘ARGUMENT’ IS ALLOWED. THE ‘SUPERIOR ARGUMENT’ IS NOT ALLOWED TO ASSERT ITSELF, IN THE WAY ‘SCIENTIFIC METHOD’ AND ‘PHILOSOPHY’, OTHERWISE WOULD. SIMPLY BECAUSE THEY WOULD ASSERT THE SUPERIORITY OF THE NARRATIVE THAT CHALLENGES ‘THE OFFICIAL NARRATIVE’. I AM NOT EVEN FREE TO STATE WHICH ‘OFFICIAL NARRATIVES’ I AM REFERRING TO. SO MUCH FOR THE ABSURD NOTION THAT THIS DOCUMENT IN ANY WAY, SHAPE, OR FORM, RE-AFFIRMS THE FUNDAMENTAL LIFE-BLOOD OF INFORMED CONSENT AND THE REPRESENTATION OF ALL POLITICAL VIEWS IN THE POLITICAL PROCESS. it ACTUALLY AFFIRMS THE VERY OPPOSITE. AND CLEARLY SO. AND It IS AN ABOMINATION. AND A LIE TO CLAIM OTHERWISE. SUCH A HEINOUS LIE, THAT THREATENS TO CRUSH THE VERY HEART OF OUR DEMOCRATIC IDEALS, THAT it ITSELF HIGHLIGHTS THE VERY PROBLEM, THAT I AM NOT, THANKS TO THE PEOPLE WHO WROTE THIS UN PROPOSAL, AND WHO PROMOTED IT, AND SUPPORTED IT, AT LIBERTY TO EXPOSE. AN OBVIOUS CONSPIRACY TO PERVERT THE COURSE OF JUSTICE, AND TO DENY THE WORLD THE ENJOYMENT OF REAL DEMOCRATIC PROCESSES. MAKING THE VERY POSSIBILITY OF ‘INFORMED CONSENT’ IMPOSSIBLE. LEAVING PEOPLE WITH NOTHING BUT THE FALSE ‘CROCK’ OF ‘CONSTRUCTIVE CONSENT’. DENYING PEOPLE INFORMED CONSENT, AND MERELY LEAVING THEM TO SUBMIT TO MANDATES WITH NOT SCIENTIFIC OR HISTORICAL BASIS, OR NOT. IF THEY SUBMIT, THEY ARE CONSIDERED TO HAVE GIVEN THEIR ‘CONSTRUCTIVE’ CONSENT. IF THEY DO NOT SUBMIT, THEY FACE THE FULL VIOLENCE OF THE STATE. AND LIKE ME, THE PROSPECT OF SPENDING THE REST OF THEIR LIVES IN PRISON, IF THEY WILL NOT SELF-CENSOR TRUTH.
TO PUT THINGS SIMPLY. THIS RESOLUTION, AND THE LAWS OF THE NATIONS THAT HAVE ALREADY ENACTED CRIMINAL LAWS FORCING INFORMED PEOPLE TO ‘SELF’ CENSOR, ARE THE EQUIVALENT OF SOCRATES’ ATHENIANS VOTING FOR HIS DEATH, FOR HIS FAILURE TO SELF CENSOR! SOCRATES IS HELD UP AS A HERO OF TRUTH AND JUSTICE. BUT THE ALLEGEDLY ‘MODERN’ NATIONS ARE MURDERING HIM, AND ALL THOSE WHO ALSO VALUE TRUTH ABOVE ALL ELSE, ALL OVER AGAIN. NEVER AGAIN INDEED! AT THE SAME TIME THE GERMAN AUTHORITIES USE GOETHE AS THEIR PUBLIC RELATIONS ‘POSTER-CHILD’. THE SAME GREAT MAN WHO WARNED THAT ‘DAS BESTE DAS DU WISSEN KANNST, DARFST DU DEN BUBEN DOCH NICHT SAGEN! *You are NOT allowed to teach your students the most important things you HAVE to teach! WHILE ALSO WARNING THAT ‘NONE ARE MORE ENSLAVED, THAN THOSE WHO (FALSELY) BELIEVE THEY ARE FREE. THIS UN RESULTION IS INTENDED TO ALLOW THOSE THAT CENSORSHIP HAS LEFT COMPLETELY BLIND TO WHAT IS GOING ON, TO IMAGINE THEY ARE ‘ENLIGHTENED’, AND RULED BY ‘ENLIGHTENED’ LEADERS. RATHER THAN DICTATORS. WHO RULE BY DECEPTION. IN FACT MAKE WAR ON THEIR OWN PEOPLE, BY DECEPTION. AS THEY MAKE WAR UPON THEIR NATURAL ALLIES AND FRIENDS. ALL BASED ON WAR PROPAGANDA. LIES. AND DECEPTION.
PP7 Reaffirming the positive role that the exercise of the right to freedom of opinion and expression and full respect for the freedom to seek, receive and impart information can play in strengthening democracy and combating religious intolerance, and reaffirming further that the exercise of the right to freedom of expression carries with it special duties and responsibilities, and may therefore be subject to certain restrictions, but these shall only be such as are provided by law and are necessary for respect of the rights or reputations of others, and for the protection of national security or of public order, or of public health or morals, and that all measures taken must be in full compliance with international human rights law, in accordance with article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights,
THE PUBLIC MUST BE MADE AWARE OF THE SPECIOUS, DISINGENUOUS, SOPHISTIC, NATURE OF THE ABOVE STATEMENT. ALONG WITH ITS NEURO LINGUISTIC PROGRAMMING, ‘MIRROR AND LEAD’, MANIPULATION.
IRONICALLY, it IS PERHAPS THE ONLY PARAGRAPH OF THE ENTIRE UN RESOLUTION THAT WE ARE FREE TO PUBLICALLY DECONSTRUCT AND DISSECT, AND CRITICALLY EVALUATE.
It IS A CRIME IN MOST NATIONS, AND IF THIS RESOLUTIONS IS PAST, WILL BECOME DE FACTO INTERNATIONAL LAW, TO APPLY THE PRINCIPLES OF SCIENTIFIC METHOD, AND HISTORICAL INVESTIGATION, TO ‘THE OFFICIAL HOLOCAUST NARRATIVE’. THIS RESOLUTION, LIKE LAWS ENACTED IN MANY NATIONS ALREADY, SETS ‘THE OFFICIAL HOLOCAUST NARRATIVE’ UP AS ENJOYING AN EXCLUSIVE AND EXCEPTIONAL ENTITLEMENT TO FREEDOM FROM PUBLIC SCRUTINY.
ALL THE OTHER PREMISES OF THIS RESOLUTION ARE LEGALLY PROTECTED FROM CHALLENGE ALSO. THIS IS THE ULTIMATE IN TELEOLOGICAL (CIRCULAR) ARGUMENT. SUCH ARGUMENTS ARE ‘SLEIGHT OF MOUTH’. TRICKS. FALLACIOUS. THE OPPOSITE OF ‘COMPELLING’. THEY ARE UNREASONABLE AND IRRATIONAL. BUT IF YOU ACCEPT THE PREMISE, THE ASSUMPTION, THEN THE CONCLUSION IS LOGICAL. WHAT COMPUTER PROGRAMMERS CALL ‘GARBAGE IN, GARBAGE OUT’.
THIS UN RESOLUTION, LIKE THE LAWS IN AUSTRALIA, GERMANY, CANADA, AND MANY OTHER NATIONS, THREATENS STATE VIOLENCE TOWARDS ANYONE WHO, LIKE ME, ATTEMPTS TO EXPOSE THE FALLACIOUSNESS OF THE PSEUDO-ARGUMENT IN THIS PARAGRAPH. LET ALONE THE NATURE OF THE ASSERTIONS MADE THROUGHOUT THE RESOLUTION, AND ‘DECLARED’ TO BE ‘FACTUAL’. BUT I AM LITERALLY NOT AT LIBERTY TO PUBLICALLY DISCUSS THE NATURE OF THE ASSERTIONS, ASSUMPTIONS, PREMISES, AND OTHER DOGMAS PRESENTED IN THE REST OF THE RESOLUTION.
THE ASSUMPTIONS, THE PREMISES, MADE IN THE RESOLUTION ARE NOT DEMONSTRATED, BUT ASSERTED. AND THEN USED TO ‘PROVE’ THEMSELVES. FOR EXAMPLE, ‘I AM NOT A LIAR, THEREFORE THIS STATEMENT MUST BE TRUE’. IF YOU ARE NOT LEGALLY FREE TO CHALLENGE THE FIRST STATEMENT, THE SECOND STATEMENT REMAINS, LOGICALLY, IN FORCE. IF ANY EVIDENCE OF ME HAVING LIED IS CENSORED, THEN THERE IS NO WAY TO DISPROVE THE STATEMENT. IF it IS A CRIME TO EVEN EXPLAIN WHY THE STATEMENT IS CIRCULAR, AND THUS ‘PURE JUNK’, THEN THE LOGICAL FALLACY IMPLICIT IN it WILL NEVER BE EXPOSED. NOT PUBLICALLY ANYWAY. THE FEW PEOPLE WHO ‘HAVE EYES TO SEE’, WILL BE COMPELLED TO SELF-CENSOR, FOR FEAR OF STATE VIOLENCE.
THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT THE CATHOLIC CHURCH DID IN RELATION TO ITS VARIOUS DOGMAS, AND ASSERTION THAT ‘THE BIBLE’ WAS INFALLIBLE. BEYOND QUESTION. WHEN SCIENCE ARGUED, AND MANY PEOPLE WOULD CLAIM, DEMONSTRATED, THAT THE WORLD WAS SPHERICAL, RATHER THAN FLAT, THE CATHOLIC CHURCH not only CRIMINALISED THEM, but DEMONISED them. Just as today so-called ‘Holocaust Deniers’ are not just criminalised, but literally DEMONISED. As EVIL. As serving ULTERIOR MOTIVES that have nothing to do with the love of truth and justice. THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT THIS UN RESOLUTION INTENDS TO DO. INTERNATIONALLY. JUST AS MANY GOVERNMENTS HAVE ALREADY DONE ON A NATIONAL LEVEL. TO ABUSE STATE POWER, TO ENFORCE DOGMAS, AND PREVENT FREE PUBLIC DISCUSSION. TO PREVENT THE PUBLIC BEING INFORMED OF THE ARGUMENTS PRESENTED FOR ‘A SPHERICAL EARTH’. TO GRANT THE ‘FLAT EARTH’ NARRATIVE LEGAL PROTECTION. I COULD EASILY SPEND THE REST OF MY LIFE IN PRISON AS A ‘HERETIC’ OR ‘APOSTATE’, FOR CHALLENGING ‘THE OFFICIAL HOLOCAUST NARRATIVE’. it IS A DOGMA THAT REQUIRES THE ABUSE OF STATE VIOLENCE IN ORDER TO SURVIVE IN AN ALLEGED ‘AGE OF REASON’, ALLEGEDLY DEFINED BY ‘SCIENTIFIC METHOD’ AND FREEDOM.
THE CATHOLIC CHURCH ASSERTED THAT ITS DOGMAS WERE INFALLIBLE. WITHOUT ANY EVIDENCE AT ALL. it TORTURED AND HORRIFICALLY MURDERED THOUSANDS OF ‘HERETICS’ AND ‘APOSTATES’ WHO CHALLENGED THESE DOGMAS. WHY? BECAUSE THESE DOGMAS WERE THE SOURCE OF ITS POWER. THE OFFICIAL HOLOCAUST NARRATIVE DOES NOT JUST BENEFIT ‘JEWS’ DIRECTLY WITH OVER 1 BILLION DOLLARS IN ‘COMPENSATION’ EACH YEAR. THAT IS JUST THE MOST OBVIOUS BENEFIT. JUST AS THE CHURCH TITHES AND PAPAL ‘DISPENSATIONS’ EARNED PRIESTS AND THE CHURCH A FORTUNE. THE TRUE VALUE OF THE DOGMAS WAS IN THE POWER THEY GAVE THE CHURCH. THE POWER TO TRICK PEOPLE INTO SUBMITTING TO THEIR ARBITRARY PRESCRIPTIONS AND PROSCRIPTIONS. ALL DESIGNED TO BENEFIT A TINY ELITE, AT THE EXPENSE OF THE MASS OF ‘DUPES’. HOMO FIDEO. BELIEVING MAN.
It ALSO REPRESENTS A BREACH WITH THE MODERN PRINCIPLE OF SEPARATING CHURCH AND STATE. BUT THAT IS A THEME FOR ANOTHER ESSAY.
It IS ‘FRAMED’, IN FACT, TO APPEAR TO RECONCILE CENSORSHIP WITH THE FIRST AMENDMENT. WITH THE KEYWORD BEING ‘APPEAR’. FOR THE FIRST AMENDMENT WAS WRITTEN TO THWART EVERY ATTEMPT AT CENSORSHIP, EVEN BY SUBTERFUGE. it IS AN INALIENABLE RIGHT. MEANING NO AMERICAN CITIZEN CAN BE DEPRIVED OF IT. ‘ALIENATED’ FROM IT. BUT THIS IS WHAT THIS RESOLUTION DOES, DE FACTO. BY PROXY. SIMPLY BYPASSING ALL INALIENABLE RIGHTS, AS it DOES WITH ITS ‘DECLARATION OF A PANDEMIC’ CLAUSE. WHICH EVEN TODAY MOST PEOPLE ARE UNAWARE COMPLETELY ‘VETOES’ ALL THE OTHER NICE SOUNDING HUMAN RIGHTS EXPRESSED IN ITS CHARTER ON HUMAN RIGHTS. JUST AS THIS RESOLUTION EFFECTIVELY CENSORS PEOPLE EVERYWHERE, ON THE MOST IMPORTANT SUBJECT.
WHAT IS THAT MOST IMPORTANT SUBJECT? WELL, AS A ‘FREE’ CITIZEN OF THE ‘FREE’ WEST, I AM NOT AT LIBERTY TO TELL YOU. I WOULD BE PLACED IN PRISON FOR THE REST OF MY LIFE, UNTIL I AGREED TO SELF-CENSOR ONCE MORE.
AND SURELY YOU MUST ASK YOURSELF WHY SUCH LAWS EXIST. WHAT IS it I HAVE TO SHARE WITH YOU, THAT IS SO IMPORTANT, THEY ARE WILLING TO LITERALLY DESTROY ME, AND ANYONE ELSE, WHO MIGHT DARE ATTEMPT TO EXPLAIN TO YOU.
AND SURELY YOU MUST ASK YOURSELF, WHAT CONSPIRACY COULD BE SO POWERFUL, THAT NOT ONLY COULD it WIELD SUCH ULTIMATE POWER OVER ALLEGEDLY ‘FREE’ CITIZENS IN THE ALLEGEDLY ‘FREE’ DEMOCRATIC WEST, BUT COULD REMAIN HIDDEN FROM THE CONSCIOUSNESS OF THE PUBLIC. SO THAT FOR ALL INTENTS AND PURPOSES, VERY FEW PEOPLE KNEW OF ITS EXISTENCE. AND HOW it OPERATES. AND WHAT ITS OBJECTIVES ARE.
I MAY ALREADY HAVE SAID TOO MUCH. AND THEY HAVE THE NEURO LINGUISTIC PROGRAMMING TECHNIQUES, AND ABSOLUTE POWER, TO ‘INTERPRET’ MY WORDS HERE TO MAKE EVEN THEM, WHICH TO YOU MIGHT BE EXTREMELY VAGUE, EVEN MEANINGLESS, CRIMINAL, UNDER LAWS THE PUBLIC ARE TOLD ARE THERE TO ‘PROTECT’ MINORITY GROUPS FROM POLITICAL PERSECUTION. WHILE it IS THE VERY LAWS THEY WILL PROSECUTE ME WITH, WHICH REPRESENT THE MOST BLATANT ABUSE OF POLITICAL POWER TO PERSECUTE MINORITY POLITICAL OPINIONS. AND THERE IS NO NATION WHERE I MIGHT SEEK POLITICAL REFUGE, FOR PROTECTION FROM PERSECUTION FOR MY POLITICAL OPINIONS. BECAUSE SUCH PERSECUTION IS, IN EVERY ‘OCCUPIED’ NATION, DEFINED AS ‘PROSECUTION’. JUST AS WAS THE CASE WITH PLATO’S SOCRATES. AND THE GOSPEL’S JESUS. AND IN EVERY ONE OF THE TENS OF THOUSANDS HORRIFIC PUBLIC MURDERS CARRIED OUT BY THE CATHOLIC INQUISITION. OR THE TENS OF MILLIONS OF ‘PROSECUTIONS’ ENACTED BY THE SOVIET AUTHORITIES, WHO SENT ‘POLITICAL CRIMINALS’ TO BE WORKED TO DEATH IN THE GULAGS. TO ‘QUARANTINE’ THEM FROM SOCIETY. YES, THIS UN RESOLUTION IS AS ‘FREEDOM LOVING’ AND ‘CAREFUL OF PROTECTING DEMOCRACY’ AS THE SOVIETS WERE. THEY TOO OFFERED ELECTIONS. AND EVEN CALLED THEMSELVES, FOR EXAMPLE, THE DEMOCRATIC GERMAN REPUBLIC (DDR). EVEN TODAY IN CHINA YOU GET TO VOTE. AS WE DO. IN OUR ‘FREE’ WESTERN ‘DEMOCRACIES’. WE LEARNED HOW ‘FREE’ WE REALLY ARE, DURING THE ‘LOCKDOWNS’. THOSE OF US ‘WITH EYES TO SEE’, SAW THE ‘POWER OF THE NARRATIVE’ AS THE REAL POWER. AND UNDERSTAND THAT ‘CONTROL OVER THE NARRATIVE’, VIA CENSORSHIP, IS THE ULTIMATE POWER. BECAUSE it IS UNSEEN POWER. UNOBTRUSIVE.
MARKUS HEINRICH REHBACH
IN EXILE FROM MY OWN ‘FREE WESTERN DEMOCRACIES’
LIKE SOCRATES, AND JESUS, PROMOTING ‘THE LIVING WORD’. THE ELENCHUS. THE SOCRATIC DIALOG. WHY? WELL, AS JESUS PUT it ‘THE LAW BRINGS DEATH’. MEANING SOCIAL CONVENTIONS ‘SET IN STONE’ AS ‘DOGMAS’ AND ‘ARTICLES OF FAITH’ AND ‘OFFICIAL NARRATIVES’ THAT MAY NOT BE CHALLENGED. ALLEGED ‘ESTABLISHED SCIENCE’, WHERE THE TERM ITSELF IS AN OXYMORON, AND WOULD NEVER BE UTTERED BY A GENUINE SCIENTIST FOR it IS ANTITHETICAL TO THE VERY CONCEPT OF SCIENTIFIC METHOD ITSELF!
MARCH 11, 2024
TROONATNOOR 